2023 Merger Filings
In 2023, State Administration for Market Regulation (“SAMR”) saw a slight increase of 1.2% in merger filings compared to last year. It reviewed and cleared 786 deals, 782 of which were approved without any conditions, while 4 were approved subject to remedies, namely Wanhua Chemical/Yantai Juli, MaxLinear/SiliconMotion, Simcere Pharma/Tobishi, and Broadcom/VMware. Improving the efficiency of merger review has been one of the top priorities for SAMR. The majority (more than 80%) of the notified mergers were filed through the simplified case procedure; and of all filings made in 2023, SAMR managed to grant clearance within 25.7 days (on average) of case acceptance, 0.8 days fewer than the average the previous year.
Of the four remedy decisions in 2023, structural remedies were imposed in Simcere Pharma/Tobishi, while behavioral remedies were imposed in all other cases. The behavioral remedies imposed in global technology deals such as MaxLinear/SiliconMotion are typical of SAMR practice in the past few years, which include the requirement that the merged entity will ensure supplies of its products and services to Chinese customers on a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory basis, and refrain from engaging in tying or imposing other terms on counterparties that are deemed to be unfair.
Fewer Merger Filings in 2024 Under New Filing Thresholds?
According to data released by SAMR in February 2024, the increased filing thresholds, effective as of January 26, 2024, may have the result of reducing the number of merger filings with SAMR by about 30% from the 2023 levels.
In the coming year, SAMR likely will focus much of its enforcement efforts on high-profile M&A deals between global multinational companies in industry sectors such as semiconductors, manufacturing, and life sciences. SAMR will, of course, also expend resources reviewing transactions in any industry if SAMR perceives a transaction as presenting potentially serious competition concerns.
Other Developments Relating to Merger Review
In the context of US-China technology competition, U.S. export controls will continue to impact China’s review of transactions, particularly global technology deals. Specifically, SAMR officials have indicated that the trade policy (e.g., export control) considerations have been increasingly an important factor in China’s antitrust review of global deals.
In addition, SAMR may step up enforcement against gun-jumping cases now that businesses have more clarity on when they need to file under the new thresholds. The penalties for gun jumping are significantly higher. For example, the maximum penalty for deals with no competition concerns has been increased ten-fold since 2022.